Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Global Plagiarism Output in the 21st century: A Bibliometric Study

Jayanta Bhakta, Trishna Bhui


Plagiarism which can be viewed as stealing of others work without proper citation is one of the leading problems in this scholarly world. The problems related to plagiarism have been escalating more quickly around the globe. Many scholars and academics have elevated their concern about the rapid growth of plagiarism. The study was made to recognize the total growth of publications written on plagiarism by worldwide authors, most productive country, highly prolific authors etc. The data was extracted during the period of 2000-2018 from Web of Science database. A totality of 2561 literatures based on plagiarism were found and calculated. Most of the literatures on plagiarism were published in the year 2017. Wiwanitkit, V was the highly prolific author by publishing 24 of the articles. 32 literatures were produced by anonymous authors. English was the most preferred language for publication and the average author per paper is 0.51. The Single authored papers are predominant during the study period and it was also observed that most of the literatures are in closed access platform.

Full Text:



Anderson, M. S. & Steneck, N. H. The problem of plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars Original Investigations. 29 (1), 2011, 90-94.

Chauhan, S. Research on Plagiarism in India during 2002-2016 : A Bibliometric Analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology. 38 (2), 2018, 69-74.

Cunha, F. Gastrostomy: Its inception and evolution. The American Journal of Surgery. 72 (4), 1946, 610-634.

Fox, H. G. Evidence of plagiarism in the law of copyright. University of Toronto Law Journal. 6 (2), 1946, 414-460.

Heitman, E. & Litewka, S. International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology: Seminars Original Investigations. 29 (1), 2011, 104-108.

Juyal, D., Thawani, V. & Thaledi, S. Plagiarism: An egregious form of misconduct. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 7 (2), 2015, 77-80.

Kokol, P., Zavrsnik, J., Zeleznik, D. & Vosner, H. B. Creating a self-plagiarism research topic typology through bibliometric visualisation. Journal of Academic Ethics. 14 (3), 2016, 221-230.

Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S. & de Vries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature. 435, 2015, 737–738.

Maurer, H., Kappe, F. & Zaka, B. Plagiarism - A Survey. Journal of Universal Computer Science. 12 (8), 2006, 1050–1084.

Singh, H. P. & Guram, N. Knowledge and attitude of dental professionals of North India toward plagiarism. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 6 (1), 2014, 6-11.

Subramaniam, K. Bibliometrics studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science. 6, 1983, 35-37.

Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 84 (2), 2010, 523-538.

Velmurugan, C. & Radhakrishnan, N. Literature output of plagiarism: a Scientometric approach through Web of Science. In: Patra, Jena, ed.: Combating Plagiarism: a new role for Librarian. New Delhi: SK Book Agency, 2015, 78-88.

Wager E. Defining and responding to plagiarism. Learned Publishing. 27, 2014, 33-42.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Disclaimer 2016-2019 © Indian Library Association (ILA), All Rights Reserved.

Designed and Developed by Dr. Mohammad Nazim under the direction of Prof. Shabahat Husain.